Dematerializtion of Architecture

The history of discourses has been developed for centuries, and architecture have entered a phase of re-evaluation. Because of the prevalent technology and media of creation in the virtual world, contemporary architecture is dematerialized to be images and abstract ideas. The definition of architecture has become however much subjective, obscure, am looseuous and limited. We took advantages from photography and the technology of visualization.But the excessive trust on the visual sensation has somehow blinded our eyes and becomes he restriction for understanding space and architecture. Photographers and designers selectively frame an object to depict a to the highest degree exaggerated angle or to capture a most exciting moment. Audiences lost their autonomy in discovering the truth, because there is no former(a) materials available except the illusions. The resulted biased understanding to architecture contradicts to Juhani Pallasmaas theory. He reaffirmed Merleau-Pontys philoso phy, the humane body is the centre of experiential world, in his book The Eyes of The Skin.He argues that multi-sensory let allows the human body perceiving the qualities of space, matter and scale in a more profound manner. However, the multi-sensory experience does non apply to those intangible architecture. The obsession of interpretation has enervated the importance of materiality. Materiality means mapping or tile texture over the flat surface in the simulation program, disregarding carnal properties, thickness, stiffness, elasticity, and density, of each specific material. We recklessly over simplify materiality.In renderings, stainless stigma eans highly reflective and shiny wood means brown and silent brick means pixelated facade. Material has been degraded to be a piece of cladding or wallpaper, fragile and dispensable. This encourages substituting one material with another material. It is not r atomic number 18 to use hollow metal with shiny coating to assume stai nless steel in the construction practice. The identity of material is weaken away. Last but not least, the inflation of the project scale has disrupt the relationship between an individual and the built habitat.The immense scale of the unfermented evelopments confuse us because everything is out of human proportion. Windows grow too big to become curtain wall. Doors are automatized, because they are too heavy to open. Towers are too high that takes hours to walk up. We cannot use the traditional quantitative implement to interpret matters. We could Just live within a building and scarce get to see the whole picture of it. The tangible structure is turn to be purely impression. Here we go back to photography in seeking a solid answer to the understanding of contemporary architecture.