Reflective Report On Class Debate Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Reflective Report On tell apart Debate - Essay ExampleThe report concludes with the learning outcome on how arguments everywhere a head are developed, structured and evaluated in a debate. Discussion The motion of the report was that the companies should have limits or makes a fixed value for the wage of the senior steering in the companies. My team members were against the motion of the debate i.e. the companies should not put limits or doesnt make a fixed value for the remuneration of senior management in their compensation policy. First, my team members worked hard in identifying the possible arguments that supports our point of view and go against the root word of the debate. Secondly, my team members organise and structure the arguable points in the most meaningful manner that convinces the opponent debating convocation. My group members would have worked better if we had used some known evidence or statistics from literature and research. My Team Members account The key points developed in support of the argument were to discuss the idea and purpose of the compensation administration and policy, addressing the worth of senior management for companies in a broader context, the changing perspectives on the reasons why management compensation are not kept fixed, and identifying reasons that justify the extended worth of senior management. Before arguing over the topic, it is important to first understand the rationale behind the wage system and policy of companies. The compensation policy by which companies reward their employees is not a mere system of paying off workers for their time and efforts, or else a compensation policy is often a strategic competitive edge by which companies go on the human capital to their organisations for a longer period of... This paper approves that the key points presented by the opponents were that wage variety leads to professional jealousy, influences motivation, detainment of financial resources around senior management and that execution of instrument criterion are reflective of crease description, responsibility and skills. The other side argued that the companies should have limits for wages of senior management, as this wage discrimination creates a negative internal competition, decreases employee motivation and professional jealously amongst the lower and top management employees. Management personnel and seniors in a union serve as assets because one, in that respect is no substitute of experience second, the speak to of attracting new talent is too stupendous than retaining the old ones.This paper makes a conclusion that when preset performance standards systematically justify the professional worth of every individual irrespective of the management level and then what is the reason for delimiting the wage scale for senior management on behalf of their extended worth? It is an unfair company policy which consumes a large proportion of organisational financial resources fo r around a small group of individuals. This limits a companys ability to leverage and transfer benefits to a major portion of employees working for that company. The forcefulness of the argument was it develops logical link between the supporting statements, though the researchers and authors have commented on both the arguments and there is no right conclusion for this debate found in the research.