Bob Gonzalezs Life and Death of Marilyn Monroe, John Everett Millais Trust Me and William Powell Friths For Better of For Worse :: Compare Contrast

dock Gonzalezs Life and Death of Marilyn Monroe, John Everett Millais Trust Me and William Powell Friths For bettor of For worse ruse may be considered the reflection of ones emotions or an outlet of ones creative thought. A person can display art, not plainly through music or dance, but also through the creativity of a play or drama. Bob Gonzalezs Life and Death of Marilyn Monroe is a great example of creatively organizing the inner thoughts of Monroe through the theatre. He went ultimo Monroes glamorous facade and showed the behind the scenes lifestyle. In addition to dramas and plays, art may also be expressed on the canvas. John Everett Millais (1829- 1896), president of royal stag Academy, did well in demonstrating his creativity with oil paints. One of his recognized kit and boodle is Trust Me. Being named the most illustrious member of the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood, Millais is a well-known Victorian Artist. William Powell Frith, too, was a renowned Victorian artist. For Better of For Worse was an oil painting with a double meaning. First, one could refer the appellation to the marriage vows. But as one further analyzes the piece, one notices that For Better or For Worse can also refer to the gap amidst the upper and lower socio-economic classes. All in all, the artists in each of these cases had a story to tell using certain tools to show emotion.William Powell Frith (1819- 1909), like umteen before him, used the tricks of the trade to simulate a certain tint in For Better or For Worse. Wardrobe and the compositional unity atomic number 18 tools he used to make this painting tell its story and setting. Frith, first, chose a wardrobe worthy of the Victorian Era. All the men were dressed in classic suits, either black or navy blue with a white shirt. The women, too, were covered in the time-conventional, puffy dresses. But the womens dresses came in assorted colors, unlike the men. Hence, the wardrobe matched the aristocr atic, social norm of the time. A pretense of the lower class wardrobe matched the times stereotype. For example, the father, seemingly decrepit and tired, was in a ruined suit with holes in the pants and patches on the sleeves. His married womans dress could not compare to the wonderful dresses of the upper class women.